Thursday, September 29, 2016

Tablets for Canberra High School Students

Canberra goes to the polls in a few weeks time to elect a local government. If reelected, the governing Labor Party has promised a tablet computer for each of 6,000 Canberra high school students, at a cost of AU $17.2 M, over four years. There are better alternatives.

The tablet proposal works out to about AU $2,800 per student, which appears expensive. There are now folding touchscreen laptops about the size of an A4 pad, for under $500. These are suitable for older students.

However, is issuing standard devices to students educationally useful? There was a previous Australian national program to provide a computer for every high school student and have been laptop and tablet programs for students in other countries. The best known of these programs was the One Laptop Per Child Project (OLPC). Such programs have not been shown to significantly benefit education and may have done some harm, by diverting resources from other educational initiatives.

An alternative strategy for Canberra would be to ensure that educational resources are available on the range of devices students have at home and school. A small fund could provide for disadvantaged students who cannot afford a $500 device. More could  could then be spent on training teachers for the Australian Digital Technologies Curriculum, using the CSER Digital Technologies Courses and the Inspire Center.

Funds could also be used to allow some of Canberra's teachers to work on new materials for both Technologies curricular, for senior students.

Assessing Competencies with Moodle

Last Friday, I attended a meeting in Canberra discussing how new features in Moodle and Mahara might be used for assessing the competencies of university students. As discussed in the previous post, Mahara SmartEvidence seems to be more suited to the reflective development of higher-order skills, while Moodle Competencies may be useful for low level skills.

Competencies were introduced in Moodle Version 3.1, 23 May 2016.  As with Mahara SmartEvidence,  Moodle Competencies allows a "framework" to be used to manage the assessment of a student against a large number of "competencies". As with Mahara only administrators can set up the frameworks in Moodle, not teachers. Unlike Mahara, Moodle has the concept of a "Learning plan", which can be designed and then applied to one student or a group of students. Teachers can also add competencies to whole and activities within courses activities.

What is unclear to me, at this stage, is the relationship between competences, learning plans, courses and frameworks. In particular what is a "learning plan": is it a collection, or sequence, of tasks with associated competencies? Is this the VET equivalent of a course?

Moodle is a course orientated system, but competencies will typically be at a finer level of detail, with perhaps six to twenty-four competencies per course (and hundreds for a program). Also students may only need a few of the competences from each course.

One interesting point is that students can also (if authorized) add evidence of prior learning, to provide evidence of competency. This practice is common in the Australian VET sector called "Recognition of Prior Learning" (RPL), but has not been so popular at universities. However, with the demand for university graduates to have more vocationally relevant skills, RPL is finding favor.

The competency tool might be used for Work Integrated Learning (WIL), where the student receives credit for practical work during their studies. However, with RPL and WIL, there is the problem of how this is assessed and verified. It is hard enough checking that a student really did a task at the institution, let alone one undertaken elsewhere.

There is provision in Moodle for manually assessing competencies, which is similar to the  process for process in Mahara SmartEvidence. One difference is that students in Moodle can be rated on a scale (so they are more than competent), rather than just partly or completely competent in Mahara.

In Mahara all the competencies are manually assessed: that is an assessor looks at the evidence the student provided on a page and decides if this partly or fully meets the requirement. In contrast, the emphasis in Moodle is on automated assessment of the competency.   Typically, the student will be considered competent when they gain a specific grade in a quiz or some other form of assessment. This follows the practice used by VET, where students do many small tests.

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Assessing Competencies with Mahara

SmartEvidence overview page
Last week I attended a meeting in Canberra discussing how new features in Moodle and Mahara might be used for assessing the competencies of university students. Mahara is introducing SmartEvidence later in the year and Moodle already has "Competencies".

Mahara SmartEvidence seems to be more suited to the reflective development of higher-order skills, while Moodle Competencies may be useful for low level skills. SmartEvidence might be used across a program), while Competencies would be used within courses).

SmartEvidence is being introduced in Mahara version 16.10 (due for release 31 October 2016). There is a brief overview of Mahara SmartEvidence in the manual and detailed technical specification. The tool is intended to allow a "competency framework" with prescribed "competencies" (also called "skills" or "attributes") to be defined. A student can then nominate which pages in their e-portfolio they believe provides evidence of the competences. An assessor can then record if the evidence partly or fully meets the requirements. Currently the student can use Mahara to present their e-portfolio, but they and the assessor have to then manually tabulate the competencies.
SmartEvidence emulates the paper based process traditionally used for competency based evaluation. Competencies can be grouped into clusters of competences to make it easier to deal with a large assessment process. As an example, the MEd has six clusters with a total of 47 competencies (Hoven, 2015).

SmartEvidence may not provide all the features needed to replace the on-line processes now used with Mahara and Moodle. As an example, SmartEvidence allows a student to nominate a page to support multiple competences. However, there is no way to point to a specific part of the page and the assessor is left to manually look though material seeing what may match. Also SmartEvidence appears to have no provision for multiple levels of assessment. In particular there is no provision for peer review of e-portfolios by other students, which I have found to be a very useful part of a program Capstone (both as a reviewer and someone being reviewed).

In addition the competency frameworks for SmartEvidence are assumed to be centrally managed and fixed. The assessor cannot make up their own framework and cannot modify a provided framework. This makes sense where there is a centralized approach used, with a division between assessment designers and implementors, however, it limits flexibility.

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Transform Academics: into Independent, Professional Educators and Impresarios

Richard Hill and Kristen Lyons wrote, "Academics are unhappy – it’s time to transform our troubled university system" (The Conversation, ). However, I suggest instead, it is time to transform our academics into independent, professional educators and impresarios.
Australian academics will be happy, when they skill-up to face the challenges of 21st century education. Universities need a mix of full-time academics, plus part-time professionals with current real-world experience.  Casual teaching is set to continue and academics need to learn how to work in this global on-line education environment.

School and VET teachers are required to have formal education to help them cope with student demands, teaching and administrative workloads. In contrast, university academics suffer frustration in the workplace, because they are not trained teachers.

Higher-degree graduates are disappointed when they find that there are few long term and permanent positions for them. The solution to this is to change the selection, training and therefore the expectations of HD students. It should be made clear to those applying to undertake post-graduate studies that this is not a ticket to a university appointment, more like a lottery.

The training for graduates needs to emphasize coursework and vocational training for jobs in industry. Those aiming for the small number of jobs in academia will require formal training in how to teach and administer, as that is what they will be spending more than half their time doing.

Researchers spend much of their time applying for grants to obtain funding, so training in business skills will also be required. This training is much the same as that provided for budding entrepreneurs.

Australian universities are currently experience a boom, with international students providing funds to subsidize research. Just as the mining boom ended with a sudden crash, it is likely that this education boom will end suddenly, in the next five to ten years.

The nations which Australia provides education services for are building their own higher education industries. Not only will these countries have less need to send students to Australia, they will be able to offer low cost education to Australian students.

Australia domestic car industry was protected for decades behind a tariff barrier, but collapsed when that barrier was removed. In a similar way Australia's education industry is protected behind a barrier which will disappear in the next five to ten years. The Australian eduction industry will collapse, if it does not prepare now for increased global competition.

Australian governments will find it increasingly difficult to provide subsidies to the local education industry. International trade agreements have exemptions from free trade for education. However, as countries see they can compete in this industry, there will be pressure to remove these barriers.

Even now, an international for-profit university can set up a campus in Australia and receive Australian government education funding. Multi-national universities do not need to employ more than a handful of staff in Australia to qualify as an "Australian" university, with the bulk of the teaching and administration done on-line, offshore. Australian students will find the option of studying on-line with an overseas university increasingly attractive.

Australian academics need to gain the skills necessary to compete in this international environment, providing reasonably priced education, which is both academically sound and vocationally relevant.

Australian Universities in EdX MicroMasters

Three Australian universities: ANU, Curtin and Queensland, are offering masters level blended courses as part of EdX MicroMasters Programs. Students can obtain credit towards up to one-quarter of a Masters (six months of the two years full-time study) for completing a series of EdX courses:
  1. Australian National University: Evidence-Based Management
  2. Curtin University: Human Rights
  3. The University of Queensland: Leadership in Global Development
However, it should be noted that these course are not free and are not pure on-line courses, requiring attendance for a capstone examination. Also the completion rates for such on-line courses is lower than for conventional on-line distance education and campus-based courses.

The completion rate for the EdX MicroMasters could be expected to be less than 1%. Rather than a low cost university program, the MicroMasters could be seen as a form of extended for-fee university entrance examination. Rafael Reif, MIT President, is quoted as saying EdX MicroMasters is "an experiment in what I call inverted admissions. Anybody anywhere can try to take those courses online."

Under the Australian Qualifications Framework, the EdX MicroMasters is closest to a Graduate Certificate, as part of a nested qualification. The use of the term "Masters" is misleading and may not comply with Australian law.

Saturday, September 17, 2016

Socializing Indonesian Terrorists

The "Digital Indonesia" conference concluded today at the Australian National University in Canberra. The standout presentation today was Nava Nuraniyah from the Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict on "Online extremism: the advent of private chat groups and its policy implications". Terrorism is a serious business, but those frequenting extremist chat groups also share interests with the rest of us, including gossip, recipes and shopping.

Friday, September 16, 2016

Digital Indonesia

Greetings from the Australian National University in Canberra, where the Vice Chancellor opened the "Digital Indonesia" conference (being live streamed). The first presentation by Eve Warburton (ANU) is giving a detailed forensic analysis of corruption and incompetence of Indonesia's politicians. It will be interesting to see how the Indonesian delegates react to this.


Program
Day 1, Friday 16 September
 

8.30am Registration
9am Welcoming remarks: Vice-Chancellor Brian Schmidt, The Australian National University
 

POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC UPDATE
 

9.05am Political update
Chair: Greg Fealy, The Australian National University
Eve Warburton, The Australian National University
Discussant: Bayu Dardias, The Australian National University
 

10.20am Morning tea

10.40am Economic update
Chair: Paul Burke, The Australian National University
Günther Schulze, University of Freiburg
Discussant: Muhamad Chatib Basri, University of Indonesia
 

12pm Lunch

1pm DIGITAL POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE
Chair: Edward Aspinall, The Australian National University
E-governance under the Jokowi administration: political promise or
technocratic vision?, Yanuar Nugroho
Executive Office of the President of the Republic of Indonesia
Digital transparency: the Kawal Pemilu story, Ainun Najib (via video recording), Kawal Pemilu
Digital Indonesia in comparison, John Postill, RMIT University


2pm COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE
Chair: Eleanor Lawson, Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Mobile telephony, Emma Baulch, Queensland University of Technology
Bridging ‘the digital divide’, Onno W Purbo, Surya University
Harnessing new data sources for policy development in Indonesia, Diastika Rahwidiati, Pulse Lab Jakarta
 

3.30pm Afternoon tea

3.50pm DIGITAL HUMANITIES
Chair: Amrih Widodo, The Australian National University
Social media and Islamic practice online/offline
Martin Slama, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Digitalising knowledge: education, libraries, archives
Kathleen Azali, ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, Hacking culture: between art, technology and science, Edwin Jurriëns, University of Melbourne
 

5.20pm Close of sessions, day one
 

6.30pm Conference dinner

Day 2, Saturday 17 September

9am THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Chair: Stephen Howes, The Australian National University
Digital economy and Indonesia: a look at the potential of creative destruction and the emerging opportunities, Mari Pangestu, University of Indonesia
The digital economy: a start-up approach, Bede Moore, Lazada Indonesia
The Go-Jek effect, Michele Ford, University of Sydney
 

10.30am Morning tea

11am DIGITAL MEDIA
Chair: Marcus Mietzner, The Australian National University
The media industry, Ross Tapsell, The Australian National University
State crackdowns online, Usman Hamid, The Australian National University


12pm SECURITY
Chair: Ken Setiawan, University of Melbourne
Online extremism: the advent of private chat groups and its policy implications, Nava Nuraniyah, Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict
Cybersecurity, Budi Rahardjo, Bandung Institute of Technology
 

1pm Lunch


2pm End of conference

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Silent Labs Like Silent Discos for Education

Bates (2015, Chapter 6) uses a rock concert as an example of an event were everyone is at the same place. However electronic audio amplification is used for rock concerts, along with large video screens. Without this electronic assistance it is unlikely the performers could be heard or seen by most of the audience at a rock concert. The sense of all being in the one place is an illusion created by the technology used. We can use this illusion in education.

One example demonstrating the use of technology intermediating to create multiple places is a "silent disco": several channels of music are broadcast simultaneously and each patron chooses which to listen to on their headphones.
University of Sydney Charles Perkins Centre X-Lab
X-lab at the Charles Perkins Centre,
The silent disco technique is used in the X-lab at the Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney. Directional loudspeakers deliver audio to selected parts of the lab, while video is directed to the student's workstations, allowing up to four classes simultaneously in one room of 240 students.

A lower cost alternative for a "silent lab" would be to have students use their mobile device to receive video and listen through a headphones, using the same webinar software as for remote access. There would be no need for any specific technology in the room used and others could remain undisturbed by the students and instructors. Classes could be held in very noisy places, without the students in a class disturbing, or being disturbed by, those not in the class.

References

Bates, A. (2015). Understanding technology in education. In Teaching in a Digital Age. BC Open Textbooks. Retrieved from https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/html/52387/1.0224023/9/1469/

Digital Service Standard for eLearning

I will be giving a short talk on "Digital Service Standard for eLearning" at the Canberra User Experience Meetup on Thursday, September 15, 2016. Also speaking are  Ross Stephan on "Usability of the Employment Services System,  Ingrid Kimber  on "Safe Work Australia Website Redesign Project", and Emma Walker on "Industry exemplar from the first wave".

Thursday, September 8, 2016

Learning to Learn Online MOOC

Athabasca University (Canada) have released the preliminary results from their latest Learning to Learn Online course. This is a five week free "MOOC" about study skills, with an optional certificate of completion. As with other free courses, only a very small proportion of the students who enroll go on to complete (8% in 2016). However, it is easy to enroll in such a course and there is no penalty for non-completion and so this completion rate is not a useful measure. Just over half (52%) of the students who enrolled signed into the course. If only those students are considered, the completion rate doubles to 16%. A further indication of students who are actively involved is those who posted to course forums, of whom 40% completed the course, which is a typical figure for conventional small group, for-fee, distanced education courses. However, this course had five staff supporting only 265 active students (53 students per instructor), so is this really a Massive Open On-line Course, or just an ordinary distance education course, which happens to be free?

Learning to Learn Online Course results

2015 2016 Increase % 2016
Enrolled 1825 1262 -563
Signed into the course 916 655 -261 52%
Completed/Passed 148 106 -42 8%
Downloaded a certificate
 
143 98 -45 8%
Discussion messages 3099 1781 -1318
Messages by facilitators 1284 192 -1092
Messages by students 1815 1589 -226
Students who posted
 
310 265 -45 21%
Pre-course surveys* completed 487 289 -198 23%
User Experience surveys* completed 120 68 -52 5%
Female, pre-course 67% 65% -0.02
Female, completed 70% 68% -0.02
English first language, pre-course 63% 70% 0.07
English first language, completed 65% 74% 0.09
Holding no degree 28% 28% 0
College/undergraduate degree 31% 31% 0
Graduate student or above 41% 41% 0