Showing posts with label ANU Australian Centre for China in the World. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ANU Australian Centre for China in the World. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 6, 2026
AI Enhancing Scams
Greetings from the "Mekong Update 2026: Cross-cutting challenges in mainland Southeast Asia" at the Australian National University. In a panel on Transnational Crime, David Boyle the Producer of Al Jazeera's "101 East", commented that AI had the potential to expand organised crime's use of scams.
Thursday, January 26, 2023
Tea and Teaching
![]() |
| Dr Jinghong Zhang making tea Photo by Tom Worthington, 2023 CC-BY |
Thursday, April 7, 2016
China Wealth and Power Conference in Canberra
Greetings from the Australian National University in Canberra, where the "China: Wealth and Power Conference" just opened. The conference is free to attend, so please come along.
The first presentation is on the "Geoeconomics of One-Belt-One-Road" (OBOR) which is a Chinese initiative to expand trade trough Asia, the Indian Ocean and Africa, to Europe.
The first presentation is on the "Geoeconomics of One-Belt-One-Road" (OBOR) which is a Chinese initiative to expand trade trough Asia, the Indian Ocean and Africa, to Europe.
Draft Program
Thursday
9:00–10:30am Session 1
Jane Golley (Australian Centre on China in the World, ANU), David Murphy (Australian
Centre on China in the World, ANU) and Michael Wesley (Bell School, ANU)
The Geoeconomics of One-Belt-One-Road
Discussant: Premachandra Athukorala
James Laurenceson (Australia-China Relations Institute (ACRI), UTS), Hannah
Bretherton (ACRI, UTS, not attending), Paul F. Burke (Centre for the Study of Choice
(CenSoC), UTS, not attending) and Edward Wei (CenSoC, UTS, not attending)
Chinese Investment in Australian Critical Infrastructure: Much Ado About Not
Much?
Discussant: Mike Callaghan
10:30–11:00am Morning Tea
11:00–12:30pm Session 2
He Wenzhen (Tsinghua University) and Graeme Smith (University of Melbourne)
The Good Life, the Good Man: Negotiating the (Chinese) Meaning of Work in the
Pacific
Discussant: Lauren Johnston
Lauren Johnston (University of Melbourne) and Marina Rudyak (Heidelberg University)
Red Aid Redux: Reflecting China's Rising Foreign Aid
Discussant: Graeme Smith
12:30–1:15pm Lunch
1:15–3:30pm Session 3
Yao Yang (Peking University) and Jiang Shigong (Peking University, not attending)
An Anatomy of the Chinese Selectocracy
Discussant: Kjeld Erik Brodsgaard
Mike Callaghan (Canberra-based Consultant, former Treasury official) and Brendan
Taylor (Bell School, ANU)
China’s Economic Rise and Evolving Role in International (Economic and Non-
Economic) Institutions
Discussant: Michael Wesley
Wang Tao (Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy, Beijing) and Frank Jotzo
(Crawford School, ANU)
Strategic Aspects of China's Climate Change and Low-Carbon Growth Strategy
Discussant: Jane Golley
3:30–4:00pm Afternoon Tea
4:00–5:30pm Panel Session: ‘China as Number One?’ Friday
9:00–10:30am Session 4
Andrew Kennedy (Crawford School, ANU) and Darren Lim (School of Politics and
International Relations, ANU)
The Innovation Imperative: Technology and Great Power Rivalry in the 21 st
Century
Discussant: Jingdong Yuan
Peter Robertson (University of Western Australia) and Jingdong Yuan (University of
Sydney)
US Strategic Trade Control and Restrictions on Dual-Use High-Tech Transfers to
China
Discussant: Andrew Kennedy
10:30–11:00am Morning Tea
11:00am–12:30pm Session 5
Premachandra Athukorala (Crawford School, ANU) and John Ravenhill (Balsillie School
of International Affairs)
China’s Evolving Role in Global Production Networks and the ‘Decoupling’ Debate
Discussant: Ligang Song
Shiro Armstrong (Crawford School, ANU) and Amy King (Bell School, ANU)
The Economics-Security Nexus and China's Rare Earths Exports to Japan
Discussant: Peter Robertson
12:30–1:15pm Lunch
1:15–2:45pm Session 6
Christopher McNally (Chaminade, Hawaii) and Julian Gruin (University of Amsterdam)
Novel Pathways to Power: RMB Internationalization and the Prospects for a Statist
Monetary Anchor
Discussant: James Laurenceson
Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard (Copenhagen Business School), Paul Hubbard (Crawford School,
ANU), Zhang Linlin (Sun Yatsen University, not attending) and Cai Guilong (Sun Yatsen
University, not attending)
State-Owned Enterprise Investment—Economic Stimulus and Political
Connections
Discussant: Christopher McNally
2:45–3:00pm Afternoon Tea
3:00pm–4:00pm Summary and ‘Output’ discussion
Wednesday, March 9, 2016
Governing China’s Neighbourhoods
Greetings from the Australian National University in Canberra, where a panel is discussing Luigi Tomba's book "The Government Next Door: Neighborhood Politics in Urban China", winner of the 2016 Joseph Levenson book prize. The book touches on the role of education in public employment: "The capital's employees in public administration units (shiye danwen), who today are recruited on the basis of examination and educational credentials, saw their average salaries more than double in the 1995-2000 period (increasing by 133 percent)." (page 99).
Luigi described how he started his research for the book by going to middle class areas, knocking on doors in Beijing and talking to the residents. Many were public employees who had been able to acquire property with a government subsidy. These were therefore no a harbinger of western style democracy, but a group who would support the existing government structure. Even when protesting about local matters, the residents use the same rhetoric as the central government, so as not to be a threat to its legitimacy. In regional areas unemployed former state workers still used the same language to express grievances in. He suggests there are different "arenas of contention" set by government for different groups (working and middle class) to have different scope to discuss grievances. Luigi points out that even one group, such as the "middle class" has many subgroups. He suggested that removing the gates on gated communities was a major undertaking. Also he suggested that the Chinese Government could adapt to any property bubble and contain possible social unrest resulting. Luigi described the construction of new communities without gates and walls as a "game changer", with more accountability. Government may have to take back some functions from the companies, such as local security.
Luigi gave a brief but fascinating description of the hybrid system where those in private apartments select and pay a company to maintain the buildings (as a body corporate does in Australia). However, the home owners have little say in what the company does and it carries out policies of the government. One interesting question is how access to the Internet and smartphones in particular may change this. Luigi briefly mentions broadband (page 113), but not smartphones. In answer to a question he commented it was not possible to sell an apartment in Beijing now without broadband and the citizens may have several smartphones, which are used for day to day and intellectual discussions.
Luigi expressed some frustration that the book cannot be orderd through Amazon.com in China (but a Chinese edition is in production). The book is available from Asia Bookroom in Canberra.
Luigi described how he started his research for the book by going to middle class areas, knocking on doors in Beijing and talking to the residents. Many were public employees who had been able to acquire property with a government subsidy. These were therefore no a harbinger of western style democracy, but a group who would support the existing government structure. Even when protesting about local matters, the residents use the same rhetoric as the central government, so as not to be a threat to its legitimacy. In regional areas unemployed former state workers still used the same language to express grievances in. He suggests there are different "arenas of contention" set by government for different groups (working and middle class) to have different scope to discuss grievances. Luigi points out that even one group, such as the "middle class" has many subgroups. He suggested that removing the gates on gated communities was a major undertaking. Also he suggested that the Chinese Government could adapt to any property bubble and contain possible social unrest resulting. Luigi described the construction of new communities without gates and walls as a "game changer", with more accountability. Government may have to take back some functions from the companies, such as local security.
Luigi gave a brief but fascinating description of the hybrid system where those in private apartments select and pay a company to maintain the buildings (as a body corporate does in Australia). However, the home owners have little say in what the company does and it carries out policies of the government. One interesting question is how access to the Internet and smartphones in particular may change this. Luigi briefly mentions broadband (page 113), but not smartphones. In answer to a question he commented it was not possible to sell an apartment in Beijing now without broadband and the citizens may have several smartphones, which are used for day to day and intellectual discussions.
Luigi expressed some frustration that the book cannot be orderd through Amazon.com in China (but a Chinese edition is in production). The book is available from Asia Bookroom in Canberra.
Friday, August 1, 2014
Study of the Chinese Internet
Professor Barmé mentioned an article he co-authored in Wired magazine in 1998, where they coined the term: The Great Firewall of China".
Day 1 (Thursday 31 July) – Small group training in social media analysis
Instructor: Dr Robert Ackland, Guest lecturer: Prof Jonathan Zhu
Day 2 (Friday 1 August) – Research presentations
9.00 Welcome
9.15-10.30 Keynote presentation
“Charting the Landscape of Chinese Social Media: What We Know and What We Don’t Know from Existing Research”, Professor Jonathan Zhu, Web Mining Lab, City University of Hong Kong
中国社会化媒体研究的已知与未知 / 中國社會化媒體研究的已知與未知
Professor Zhu commented that while the Chinese Internet was heavily controlled domestically, the government also allows (and encourages) the companies to be publicly listed on Western stock exchanges. Also he commented that as these companies are listed on sock exchanges, their reported statistics are likely to be accurate, due to strict commercial law (as an example, Weibo has to report more accurate user numbers). However, he said these were less insightful than consultant's analysis and academic papers (which might be less accurate).
Tencent earns most revenue from e-commerce, other leading sites from advertising. China has 632M Internet users, 83% mobile, with a 47% penetration rate (but there may be less than 100M active social media users). Instant messaging is most popular, blogs second most popular (Professor Zhu is sceptical of this figure), then microblogging and BBS. He commented BBS were still a livery source of discussion in China.
Professor Zhu commented that much of the literature about the Internet in China is based on case studies and is anecdotal, rather than being statistical (what in social science is called "qualitative"). He gave as an example "The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online" ( Guobin Yang, 2011). Also he commend that many studies have been by computer scientists and may be unknown to social researchers. Hopefully he has seen my paper. ;-)
Professor Zhu used Hasswell's 5W model of communication to categorise research on Chinese social media. The studies primary dealt with the communicator and audience, not content, media, or effects. The studies showed that media professionals, the elite and government officials are important sources of information on Chinese social media. One interesting finding was that police were early social media users.
What receives less mention are "grassroots" opinion leaders (as they are usually anonymous), e-marketeers and foreign individuals and entities.What was not mentioned was what role government entities marketing as something else play. The DARPA is studying Social Media in Strategic Communication (SMISC). In terms of content,
Professor Zhu said the conventional view shown in research was the contentious nature of the content and the strong censorship presence by government. But he commented most social media is used for entertainment not political comment and it is not clear how much censorship is self-censorship. He commented that some early research showed that 20% of posts were jokes, whereas only 3% were political commentary.
In terms of media, Weibo has been compared with Twitter in many academic studies.However, other platforms have not been studied, even though they are at least as popular as Weibo (but harder to get data about).
Professor Zhu pointed out that most researchers concentrate on the active users, who are probably only 12% to 20% of Chinese Internet users. He said this impacted on the ultimate question about the Internet in China: what effect does it have?
10.30-11.00 Morning tea
11.00-12.30 Paper session 1
“A Web Analysis of HIV Information Delivery in China”, Dr Robert Ackland, Australian National
University and Dr Jiaying Zhao, Australian National University
爱滋病信息的传递 :
基于网络的分析 / 愛滋病信息的傳遞 :
基於網絡的分析
“Predicting Depressed Individuals with Suicide Ideation Using Social Media Data”, Jin Han, Australian
National University
微博社交网络抑郁用户识别 / 微博社交網絡抑鬱用戶識別
“Analyzing Events in Chinese Microblogs”, Dr Lexing Xie, Australian National University
社交网络上的新闻事件分析 / 社交網絡上的新聞事件分析
12.30-1.30 Lunch
1.30-3.00 Paper session 2
“Preliminary Analysis of Muslim Networking on the Chinese Web”, Dr Wai Yip Ho, Hong Kong Institute of
Education and Dr Robert Ackland, Australian National University
中国穆斯林网络的初步分析 / 中國穆斯林網絡的初步分析
“Multiple Identity Formation via Social Media by Professional Chinese Immigrants to Australia”, Dr Jerry
Watkins, University of Canberra and Dr Chong Han, University of Western Sydney
社交媒体上的多重身份构建:以澳大利亚中国技术移民为例 /
社交媒體上的多重身份構建:以澳大利亞中國技術移民為例
“Human Flesh Searching in the Greater China Region”, Dr Lennon Chang, City University of Hong Kong
分析大中华地区人肉搜索之现象 / 分析大中華地區人肉搜索之現象
3.00-3.30 Afternoon tea
3.30-4.30 Paper session 3
“Institutional Analysis of Chinese Internet Governance: Some Tentative Thoughts”, Ryan Manuel,
Australian National University
关于互联网体制与管理若干问题的分析 / 關於互聯網體制與管理若干問題的分析
Ryan outlined some of the complexity of China's Internet regulation system. There are multiple ministries involved in Internet regulation, under the central secretariat. He argues that large Internet companies will do well out of this, as they can take much of the cost of the implementation of central censorship requirements off local government. The major Chinese Internet companies have close party connections. It would seem to me that the Chinese system for Internet regulation is an adaptation of the system used for conventional media. In addition to censorship there are state paid posters of material (as well as the "Water Party" commercial Internet PR companies).
“Internet Use in China: Citizens, Consumers, and Social Consumption in Chinese”, Dr Michael J. Jensen, University of Canberra and Wei Si, University of Canberra
因特网在中国的应用 :
公民 ,
消费者与社会消费 / 因特網 在中國的應用:公民,消費者與社會消費
Wei Si described an image based interface for a social media application, changing from something text based (which looked like Facebook to me), improved user acceptance. One thing which occurred to me was how much China's Internet user behaviour was influenced by using a mobile device first. Most Australian users will have used a PC interface for Internet use before moving to a mobile device.
4.30-5.00 Wrap up
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

