Reference
Hayes, Alexander, The Socioethical Implications of Body Worn Computers: An Ethnographic Study, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wollongong, 2020. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1/853
Reference
Hayes, Alexander, The Socioethical Implications of Body Worn Computers: An Ethnographic Study, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wollongong, 2020. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1/853
The Marie Reay building is suited to social distancing, as the floors are flat and the furniture is movable. The superfloor has been set out with tables which normally accommodate seven people (as shown in the stock image). Today each two rectangular tables have been pushed together to a make large square one, with one or two people on each side. This reduces the room's capacity in the already low density cabaret format by half.
A hand held microphone was used for audience input. This presented the problem of sterilizing the microphone between users. Microphone on a stands at fixed location would be an alternative (with an optional foot switch). A telepresence robot would be a more complex option.
This workshop is using the traditional format with a series of speakers with slides, each followed by questions from the audience. There is a slight modification, with the MC inviting remote participants to turn on their microphone to ask a question, or post it to the chat. The image of the speaker is not being transmitted, just slides. Switching from a presenter in the room to a remote one required some verbal negotiation, much like using a two-way radio. This slowed down proceedings a little, but is perhaps a good thing as it can at times be difficult for the audience to keep up with highly technical presenters.
As for the content of the workshop, one point of interest is that large renewable energy projects on indigenous land will, ironically, be unable to provide power to the local community. There will be mega watts of power being exported, but none can be provided from the large systems for the locals. The obvious solution is to require those putting in large projects to provide small independent local systems. The problem then is how are these systems maintained?
Australian education consultancy Studymove has pointed out that the higher the QS World University Ranking for an Australian university, the higher the international tuition fees charged. The correlation applies across fields and levels of study, but is least for education studies. The consultants speculate that high unemployment may result in students selecting institutions and programs with higher raking for employment outcomes. However, I expect many students don't look past the overall ranking of a university to examine individual measures. The current ranking schemes are weighted towards academic quality and research output, although these are not relevant to most students.
Like many such ranking systems, QS is heavily skewed to academic reputation. In the case of QS, the largest proportion of the overall measure is based on a survey of academics. Other raking systems use research papers published as a measure of academic quality. However, the research at a university has little effect on the quality of education a student receives. Most students are not planning to be researchers and few who complete research degrees end up in research jobs. Researchers don't make particularly good teachers anyway and this emphasis on research may be resulting in students making poor education choices.
Webometrics uses measures of openness, as well as quality, to provide a more relevant ranking of universities. This relies on readily available information, rather than surveys, which has the advantage of allowing inclusion of many more institution. In particular Webometrics includes thousands of vocational institutions which are excluded from most university ranking systems. Australian has only 43 universities, but Webometrics lists another 150 non-university institutions.
Despite the different measures used, Australian universities outrank the non-university institutions on the Webometrics scoring and the raking of universities is not very different from QS. This suggests it should be possible to create new rankings of universities at low cost, using a similar approach to Webometrics.
The Webometrics methodology, like that of QS, is heavily weighted towards academic quality. Overall, 35% of the measure is based on papers cited in research publications which perhaps explains why universities are at the top of the list, outranking vocational institutions.
The ordering of the universities is different to QS, but the same universities feature near the top of both lists. Near the bottom of the universities in the Webometrics ranking are a few large state government vocational intuitions: TAFE NSW, TAFE Queensland, Adelaide Institute of TAFE and Canberra Instituter of Technology. Just one private for-profit vocational provider also features: Open Colleges, which has a 100 year history in correspondence education.
I pasted the Webometrics list of Australian universities to a spreadsheet, and reweighed the scores by deleting the excellence measure. The leading universities remained at the top of the list, but a few vocational institutions crept up a little: Open Colleges from 41 to 39th place, TAFE NSW from 43 to 40, TAFE Queensland 46 to 44, Adelaide Institute of TAFE 45, Kangan Institute 49. Canberra Instituter of Technology dropped one place from 49 to 50.
Associate Professor Phill Dawson, from the Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning at Deakin University talked at the ANU Centre for Learning and Teaching (CLT) on Contract Cheating in Online Assessment. His new book "Defending Assessment Security in a Digital World: Preventing E-Cheating and Supporting Academic Integrity in Higher Education", is due out in October.
Professor Dawson surprised me by being mildly positive about the use of online invigilated examinations, while pointing out that the companies which provide these services were reluctant to have them independently tested. He was amused by my suggestion that a chromakey bodysuit could hide a helped in the background. ;-)
abo
Many recent discussions of Australian education I have taken part in have the theme of what to do after COVID-19. The sense is that things have been bad, but under control: what of the changes brought in as an emergency measure should be kept in the long term? However, I suggest Australian universities should not assume there will be a period of stability in which to gradually introduce changes. COVID-19 is just a foretaste of far more difficult challenges to come in the next few months and years, with technology, and geopolitics forcing changes to how, what, where and who we teach. There can be a larger sudden interruption to international student access to Australian campuses in the next few months, and in the next few years new alternatives to studying in Australia for both domestic and international students (Worthington, 2014).
Australian universities should now flip their educational offerings, along with their teaching. With flipped learning students are encouraged to study material online before attending a class. In the same way, students should be offered online study, before attending a campus. Universities do not have to abandon the campuses they have invested so much in recently, just make minor tweaks to boost online learning
E-learning has been proven over at least a decade. It has been
shown possible to produce high quality, active learning
courses and blend them with campus instruction. This has been done
with mixed teams of domestic and international students, undertaking
practical projects online together, to meet professional accreditation
requirements. It is possible to teach staff how to do this across the Australian HE sector.
I have been teaching online since 2009. Most of my students were
happy with this model and get similar results to their classroom courses.
However, many academics are reluctant to undertake the training required
to teach this way and students have been reluctant to sign up for
online courses, seeing them as inferior.
One way to make online learning more attractive is to offer it as part
of a package, with campus instruction. As an example, for computer project students last year I designed a learning module with asynchronous
delivery. This has automated quizzes, discussion
forums, videos, ebook and peer assessment. But added to this are face
to face workshops, held in a purpose-built flat floor classroom (Worthington, 2020).
The blended model ran for two semesters in 2019. When COVID-19 struck in
2020, the workshops were moved to Zoom. There was no need to change the
course materials, activities, or assessment, as an emergency online
contingency had been planned for (Worthington, 2014 & 2016). There is
the option of using a hybrid model in the future, with some students in
the classroom and some online. Also recent online
hackathons I have helped mentor for the Australian National University, Australian Computer Society, and the Australian and NZ Defence Forces
show promise.
Academics' reluctance to learn to teach online can be addressed by
offering teacher training part of a degree, before they become academics.
Rather than being seen as just a training course, teaching can be
promoted as part of the skill-set of every profession. Our tutors can
study teaching as part of their degree program and pay the usual course fees to do so, at the same time they are paid to tutor. Tutors
not enrolled in a degree can receive a micro-credential.
The key, I suggest, is not to focus on moving courses online, as that is
a relatively simple task. A bigger challenge is to have programs that
are more than just a collection of "courses" and offer students
vocationally relevant training, with flexibility. I discussed this last
week in my last talk in Canada on "Higher education after COVID-19".
In my last talk I described COVID-19 as a White Swan event: one they were warned of but failed to prepare for. Some may dispute they were warned, but after COVID-19, all universities must understand that the flow of international students to Australian campuses may suddenly stop again in the next year. In the longer term, there will be new international competition both for Australian domestic students and international ones.
The Australian Government and university leadership may not act in time, so I suggest individual university academics should individually prepare for the new higher education environment. They can ensure they gain skills to teach in in new ways, which may require they spend their own time and money learning. Also academics should look to set up new companies, and encourage their students, to provide educational services. This can be done in the startup centers set up on and around our campuses. Some might argue that our academics should concentrate on their day jobs, but most of those are going to disappear as the business of education changes over the coming months and years.
Worthington, T. (2012, July). A Green computing professional education
course online: Designing and delivering a course in ICT sustainability
using Internet and eBooks. In 2012 7th International Conference on
Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (pp. 263-266). IEEE. URL
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2012.6295070
Worthington, T. (2014, August). Chinese and Australian students learning
to work together online proposal to expand the New Colombo Plan to the
online environment. In 2014 9th International Conference on Computer
Science & Education (pp. 164-168). IEEE. URL
https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/11724/1/Worthington%20Chinese%20and%20Australian%20students%20learning%202014.pdf
Worthington, T. (2017). Tom Worthington's MEd(ED) ePortfolio:
Conclusion, Athabasca University. IEEE. URL
http://www.tomw.net.au/masters_eportfolio/conclusion.shtml
Worthington, T. (2020, June). Blend and Flip for Teaching Communication
Skills to Final Year International Computer Science Students. Paper
accepted for the IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment
and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 10-13 December 2019, Yogyakarta,
Indonesia. URL https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/204833
Replace Old Lecture Theatres with Energy Efficient Flexible Teaching Spaces
ANU's older lecture theatres have tiered floors with fixed seats. These can be replaced with flexible classrooms suiting modern education techniques, and which are more energy efficient. Modern teaching techniques emphasise student discussion and teamwork, which is difficult to do when all the seats are fixed facing forward. The Marie Reay Teaching Centre in ANU's Kambri precinct, has flat floors made of engineered sustainable plantation timber, with furniture on wheels. This has been used for flipped blended learning (Worthington, 2020). As students undertake more study outside the classroom with this approach, less teaching space will be required, reducing energy use further.
Reference
Worthington, T. (2020, June). Blend and Flip for Teaching Communication Skills to Final Year International Computer Science Students. Paper accepted for the IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 10-13 December 2019, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. URL https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/204833
Shift 80% of ANU Learning Online to Reduce CO2 Emissions
ANU's Vision for Excellence in Learning and Teaching only requires minor tweaking to boost online learning, without abandoning the campus. The average student needs to be on campus for about 20% of their study. By facilitating the other 80% of study off campus, the ANU can reduce its emissions per student, and also help students reduce their carbon footprint through reduced travel.
An example of such an online course is, appropriately enough, "ICT Sustainability" (COMP7310), first offered online in 2009 (Worthington, 2012). This course teaches students to estimate and reduce carbon emissions though the use of computers and the internet. Students undertake the course wherever in the world they happen to be.
Online learning can be part of an attractive package, with campus instruction. As an example, ANU TechLauncher students have been learning this way (Worthington, 2020).
References
Worthington, T. (2012, July). A Green computing professional education course online: Designing and delivering a course in ICT sustainability using Internet and eBooks. In 2012 7th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (pp. 263-266). IEEE. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2012.6295070
Worthington, T. (2020, June). Blend and Flip for Teaching Communication Skills to Final Year International Computer Science Students. Paper accepted for the IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 10-13 December 2019, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. URL https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/204833
The organizers first asked for an abstract (below) and then a 5 to 8 minute video. The videos will be made available two weeks before the symposium. On the day, there are one hour sessions scheduled with five "papers" each, so about ten minutes per paper. Each presenter has been asked to include two or three questions, or statements, to promote discussion. This is an interesting attempt to translate the symposium format to the online world.
In a traditional academic symposium, the presenter reads their entire paper word by word. With a literate writer, who is also an engaging speaker, on an interesting topic, this can be spellbinding, but often it is very tedious. It will be interesting to see if the online format, with pre-recorded videos and the questions is successful in creating a useful discussion.
Mr Tom Worthington, Honorary Lecturer, Research School of Computer Science, The Australian National University
Like many educators, my world changed suddenly in early 2020. I was called to an emergency meeting of the staff of the Australian National University, College of Engineering and Computer Science. We were told that due to COVID-19 many of our international students would be unable to get to campus: could we teach them online? There was a moment of shocked silence, then a roar of questions: “How many? How long for? Will they have Internet access? What about assessment?” It happened for my Masters of Education I looked at how to provide online education to international students at a research intensive university. Also I had worked in emergency planning at the Australian Department of Defence, so had some relevant experience. But it has been a challenging year. What are the lessons learned for educating professionals online? How will this change higher education for domestic and international students into the future?
"The advice from our ANU medical experts is clear: to control the spread of COVID-19 we must take tough action ... so effective tomorrow Thursday 26 March, all our campuses will shift to remote work and study." From the Vice Chancellor of the Australian National University, Professor Brian P. Schmidt AC FAA FRS, 25 March 2020.
On 6 February 2020 I attended an emergency staff meeting at the Australian National University where we were asked if we could quickly switch to teaching online. Some of our students and staff were overseas so unable to return to campus. The Vice Chancellor announced first a "pause", then a wholesale shift to online teaching and working from 26 March.
Wall mounted LCD screens & desks on wheels at ANU Marie Reay Teaching Centre |
MQB Platform for VW, Audi, SEAT, Å koda, coupes, hatchbacks, saloons, station wagons, convertibles, MPVs, SUVs, and panel vans (Ra Boe / Wikipedia) |
Excerpt from ACS Certified Professional Certificate |
Fighting Pandemics virtual hackathon, August 8, 2020, by the ANU Humanitarian Innovation Society (ANU HISoc), with the Clinton Global Initiative University and IBM |
Infographic: Learning |
The video contains images that were used under a Creative Commons License. https://link.attribute.to/cc/1559254