TIME Magazine's Ranking of the World's Top Universities

Time Magazine has produced a ranking of the World's Top Universities. Note that this is from a different publisher and is a different ranking scheme to the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. Time claim their rankings are more relevant to students, but produce much the same results as Times & other ranking schemes. The Time & Times rankings have the same 8 universities in their top 10 for Australia. Also Time only rank 500 universities, compared to more than 5,000 by Webometrics. As with most such ranking schemes this seems more about selling advertising than helping students.

Time moves Curtin & James Cook Universities to the top 10, dropping University of Technology Sydney, and Macquarie University.

1. University of Queensland (6)
2. University of Melbourne (1)
3. University of Sydney (2)
4. University of Western Australia (8)
5. University of New South Wales (5)
6. Australian National University (4)
7. University of Adelaide (7)
8. Monash University (3)
9. Curtin University (13)
10. James Cook University (24)

Time's ranking is based on a shortlist of one highly cited researcher in Clarivate, "among the most renowned and frequently mentioned institutions", or they applied to be on the list. The detailed ranking appears similar to other such schemes. These tend to emphasize research output, rather than education. Time appears to have tried to emphasize education more, with measures such as resource expenditure per student, faculty-to-student and staff-to-student ratios. There is no measure of what proportion of staff are qualified to teach. Essentially, these are measures of input, rather than output. 

Government of India's National Institutional Ranking Framework

The Indian Ministry of Education has a National Institutional Ranking Framework, ranking universities. All but one of the top ten institutions for 2025 in the Indian government's ranking also appear in the top ten by Webometrics:

1. Indian Institute of Technology Madras (3)
2. Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru (7)
3. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (2)
4. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (4)
5. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (8)
6. Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (1)
7. Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (10)
8. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi (9)
9. Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi (17)
10. Banaras Hindu University,Varanasi (6)

Sixteen Australian Universities in the top 100 for Sustainability Worldwide

Australian universities have done very well in the QS World University Rankings for Sustainability 2024. There are 16 Australian universities in the top 100, based on environmental, social and governance (ESG) challenges. This includes many large capital city universities, which I would have assumed would have more difficulty with sustainability, due to densely built inner city campuses. The regional universities have ranked lower. This may reflect the amount of specialist expertise needed to document sustainability, rather than level of sustainability itself. One way around that would be for students to undertake this as part of their coursework.

1.  7 University of Sydney
2.  9 University of Melbourne
3. 11 University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney)
4. 23 Monash University
5. 30 Australian National University (ANU)
6. 36 University of Queensland
7. 40 Griffith University
8. 43 University of Technology Sydney
9. 49 University of Adelaide
10. 57 Macquarie University
11. 62 RMIT University
12. 62 University of Wollongong
13. 66 Deakin University.
14. 74 University of Newcastle, Australia (UON)
15. 89 Curtin University
16. 100 Queensland University of Technology (QUT)

University Rankings Are a Marketing Tool Not a Student Guide

Julie Hare writes "Why university rankings don’t tell you what you need to know" (AFR, Oct 23, 2022). But ranking systems, such as that from  Times Higher Education (THE), were never intended as a guide for students in selecting a university. My favourite ranking system is the non-profit Webometrics, which includes things like openness. There are also some awards which explicitly look at teaching quality, such as the Good Universities Guide Awards, which show that institutions which rate poorly on THE rankings do well when it comes to education.

The ranking schemes from publishers are designed as marketing tools to help promote their publications, and help their advertisers (the universities), promote themselves. Like many industry awards, the university rankings are designed to appeal to the vanity of the established organisations and their executives. The reality is that research excellence has little to do with the quality of the education provided by a university. If anything there is a negative correlation, as researchers are not selected for their teaching ability. Also the quality of the teaching has little to do with the student's learning outcomes, as this mostly depends on the student, and their background, and the support they get externally. Universities in a particular system also tend to level outcomes. Australia has a strict government regulatory framework for universities, so there are no bad ones, and not that much difference between the top ones.

Less Conventional Institutions Sweep Good Universities Guide 2023 Awards

Congratulations to James Birt & others at Bond University, for six awards in the Good Universities Guide 2023 Awards. It is interesting to see how Bond, along with University of New England, beat the more conventional institutions. Bond is a small, business teaching-focused, private not-for-profit university. UNE pioneered distance education in the 1950s, and was one of the models for the UK Open University.

But students need to keep in mind that Australia doesn't have any bad universities. Our universities, public or private, not or for-profit, research or education focused, are all good.

 ps: I am delighted to have helped ANU win for "Staff Qualifications". ;-)

Australian Universities Rank Well for Impact Globally

Australian universities have come out well in The Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2021, having 4 in the top 10 and 17 in the top 100.

Times Higher Education assesed universities against the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Out of 1,115 universities, the University of Manchester (UK) comes first, followed by three Australians: University of Sydney, RMIT and La Trobe. University of Wollongong comes in sixth. 

On the SDG goal of "Quality of Education" (central to the mission of universities), Australia did not do so well, with only one in the top 10: University of Canberra at 5 and only 12 in the top 100.

The SDG goal of "Gender Equality" gave an interesting result, with a Saudi Arabian institution coming out on top: Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, followed by three from Australia: La Trobe University, Western Sydney University and Charles Darwin University.

Australia had no universities in the top ten for "Industry Innovation and Infrastructure", with University of British Colombia (Canada) on top. This is well deserved, I visited UBC in 2014 to look at education and innovation.

Of course not too much should be read into these type of rankings. Those universities without the resources to devote to filling in the information requests from ranking organisations will tend to not do so well. They might instead want to devote resources to helping with development. In particular thousands of training focused institutions, which are providing most of the practical assistance with development, don't appear in these rankings. The "Webometrics Ranking of World Universities" includes about 9,000 more institutions than Times. 

Unfortunately some universities choose to release misleading statements based rankings. As an example CQ University previously claimed "CQUNI RANKS IN TOP 25 PER CENT OF UNIS WORLDWIDE FOR SUSTAINABILITY" (23 April 2020). However, only about 1,000 institutions are included in the rankings. So we don't know how CQU performs against the many more thousands not included. While it might be assumed these institutions would not rank well against leading universities in terms of research output, that may not be the case in terms of quality of education or sustainability. Australian universities should refrain from making such misleading claims as it could damage their reputation and that of the nation. In 2017 the UK Advertising Standards Authority issued guidelines to stop UK universities making similar misleading claims.  Perhaps similar guidelines are needed in Australia.

ps: I made a submission to the Australian Senate on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in 2018, on "Education for Sustainable Development".