Showing posts with label iPad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label iPad. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Why Do Your Expect an Improvement in Learning with iPads?

Jay Ashcroft asks "Why so many schools fail to get impact from iPad?" (Learn-Maker, 23 February 2015). But how does Jay expect that just providing an iPads, or any other tablet device, on its own to improve education? My primary class was the first at my school to use ball point pens. This was a step up from pencils, with color! But I doubt that the teacher, or anyone else, would expect this change to improve student's learning. Similarly, if you give a student an iPad, but leave the teaching methods unchanged, you can't expect an improvement in leaning (I would expect a drop in learning). What is needed is to use the Internet and the iPads to teach teachers how to teach using iPads.  Apart from being slow and expensive, the old fashioned approach of train-the-trainer sessions misses the point about the change taking place in how education is delivered.

There is a new One Laptop per Child tablet/laptop in development (the XO-infinity). It is specifically designed for school students and has interesting modular features (I would like to see USB dock and mSata docs added). But the previous OLPC devices were not shown to have improved learning and I do not expect this device to either. Jay suggests several days training for each school, with a core team of teaching doing the training. But curiously they don't suggest using the iPad itself, or the Internet, as part of the training. Insrtead this is all face-to-face teaching, which I suggest is missing the point. 

ps: The Xo_infinity is intended to have user upgradeable modules. This is a good idea in theory  (several of the laptops I have had included this feature). But I suggest basing the modules on existing interface standards and form factors, to lower the production cost and widen the choice. In particular, I suggest having:
  1. USB dongle bay, : This would be a recess in the base of the case with a removable cover and containing widely spaced USB sockets. Memory sticks, WiFi, 4G, TV and other USB devices could be plugged in.
  2. mSata Bay:  Make a plastic case which clips around a standard size mSata board, so this then can be slid into a slot in the computer case. This way custom electronics does not need to be manufactured, just the plastic case.

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Australian University Students Allegedly Cheating with iPads

I was interviewed briefly by Caroline Winter at ABC Radio's The World Today, about university students allegedly using tablet computers to cheat in examinations: "University investigates allegations of cheating" (19 Nov 2013, 2:44pm AEDT). This was a follow-up to the item "Medical students allegedly cheated on Adelaide University exam about human reproductive health" (19 November 2013, 8:01am AEDT).

Students are alleged to have screen captured from an examination paper and left them for the next group of students. Apparently the iPads were supplied by the university and not reset between examination candidates. This seems a curious way to administer a computer based examination and such an examination seems an odd way to do assessment.

For the last year I have been assisting another university to convert a paper based clinical assessment process from paper to computer. In that case the doctors supervising students in hospital use the system to report on student progress. This uses HTML 5 based web forms so that it will function with any type of tablet computer (Google Android, Apple iPad, Microsoft Surface or any web browser).

There are also ways to administer examinations on a computer, but you obviously need to restrict the student's access to material not permitted in the examination and have a real, or virtual, invigilator. You can't simply give the student any old computer (or their own) and let them sit the examination unsupervised. The exception would be "take home" examinations which make up a small proportion of the assessment, or none at all and are formative to help with learning, rather than summative.

There are ways to make cheating harder with screen based tests, such as choosing questions at random from bank and altering quantities in numerical ones.