Dr Danny Kingsley, Head of Scholarly Communication at Cambridge University Library has concluded that the UK's policy
for free and open access to publicly-funded research has failed: "Manipulation of embargo
periods, confusing information, and a graduated charging system for
different licenses all work towards ensuring a second income stream. Far
from moving to an open access future we seem to be trapped in a worse
situation than we started." (
Kingsley, 2017).
I was intrigued by Danny's inclusion of "
scheduled tweets" to accompany
the presentation.
To answer the question at the end of the presentation "How do we get out
of this mess?", I suggest a modestly funded initiative to encourage new
Open Access publishers. This could use the start-up infrastructure
already established around universities,
such as Cambridge.
Academic staff and students could be trained and funded to set up new
companies to provide OA publishing in competition with existing
closed-access ones. These new companies would aim to be profitable, in
the long term, while providing publications without a fee to the subscriber. The
main question to be answered by any such start-up would not be publishing infrastructure (which there is plenty of free-open-access software for), or revenue
streams (which are feasible), but what incentives could be provided to induce academics to
choose a new, unproven publisher.
Reference